Pay in installments of $22.18 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
B7202-C-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191558320000 7202CDGA P4A Gewicht: 40 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 35,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 11,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 11,00 C 15 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 04 Innenmae: mm 15,00 P4S
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0191558320000 7202CDGA/P4A |
| Gewicht: 40 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 35,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 11,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 11,00 |
| C 15° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.04 |
| Innenmaße: mm 15,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 11600 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 5000 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 144 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 1.177 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 8,8 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 19,5 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 22,1 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 57 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 5.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 11.600 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 540 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 11.600 N |
| E tk max 23,4 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 21,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 23,4 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 21,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 540 N |
| F V H 319 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 46 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 1.177 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 144 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 23,4 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,3 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 21,7 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 0,6 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 5.000 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 46 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 319 N |
| a 8,8 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 57 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 22,1 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 19,5 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,04 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Good candies!
Wow a candy thats good for your teeth! I can finally say YES to my kids even after they brush their teeth! They taste good too! I was scared to try them and was pleasantly surprised!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Less flavor than the pops. Very disappointing.
I bought these after trying the lollipop type of the same brand. Honestly? I was disappointed in the lack of flavor in yhe drops versus the lollipop style. The reason I purchased the drops was because I do not like dealing with the stick of the pop and just wanted the sucker part of the candy. I thought being the same flavors that they would have the same taste. They do not. The drops have much less enjoyable flavor and are quite bland in comparison to the lollipop style. I guess I'm sticking with dealing with the stick to get any good flavor.
I also wish the variety of the flavors in both the Zollipops and Zolli Drops was more evenly distributed. The orange are my favorite flavor and the ratio is low compared to the pink or purple and less flavorful pieces. Anyway, just my 2 cents on the difference I noticed between the two variations of the same product.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Drops are easier to open
I like the zolli drops better than the pops. They are easier to open!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Delicious!
Perfect for those days when you need a little something. You will never know they're sugar free, amd the flavors are on point. These are in regular rotation in our home now - and guilt free!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great option for fluoride-free families, has helped my sensitive teeth dramatically
This is a great non-fluoride toothpaste. Our whole family switched to nano hydroxyapatite instead of fluoride pastes, we have had great dental visits and no regrets. No one has had a cavity since switching 2 years ago, but three of the four of us didn’t have cavities to begin with. I would say that my own sensitivity to cold (something I’ve had for 40 years) has decreased significantly since using this daily. This paste is far more effective for sensitivity than high fluoride options have been for me. My two teenage boys both love this toothpaste.
My teeth feel clean. I wouldn’t say the toothpaste whitens better than any other paste does. My mouth feels fresh after brushing. I like the idea of remineralizing tooth surfaces but I don’t know how I would quantify that.
The flavors are all good, I would rank them as follows: lemon lavender, mint, cinnamon mint, cardamom, ginger (don’t get it if you don’t LOVE ginger). Cardamom is really nice but I could see getting tired of it. Ginger is kinda weird. My boys love the lemon lavender the best. The flavors can be intense but in a natural, not artificial way. It’s not too sweet at all like some pastes can be.
This toothpaste is absolutely worth the higher price point. I feel good about my family using it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2026