Pay in installments of $134.83 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 7 - Aug 12
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
QJ230 N2MA SKFTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: SKF Berechnungsfaktor: 0. 793 Berechnungsfaktor: X: 0. 6 Berechnungsfaktor: Y0: 0. 58 Berechnungsfaktor: Y1: 0. 66 Berechnungsfaktor: Y2: 1. 07 Berechnungsfaktor: e: 0. 95 Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 16. 6 kN Gewicht: 11820 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r min Herstellungsland: sterreich Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae:(D) mm 270,00 ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 45,00 Einzelgewicht in (kg):
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Berechnungsfaktor: 0.793 |
| Berechnungsfaktor: X: 0.6 |
| Berechnungsfaktor: Y0: 0.58 |
| Berechnungsfaktor: Y1: 0.66 |
| Berechnungsfaktor: Y2: 1.07 |
| Berechnungsfaktor: e: 0.95 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 16.6 kN |
| Gewicht: 11820 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r/min |
| Herstellungsland: Österreich |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(D) mm 270,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 45,00 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 12.2 |
| Innenmaße:(d) mm 150,00 |
| Interne Radialluft Cn Normale Innenluft |
| MA Machined Brass Cage Guidance By The Outer Ring |
| N2 Two Locating Slots (Notches), 180° Apart, In The Large Outer Ring Side Face |
| Wärmestabilisierung: Keine Wärmestabilisierung: - Temperaturen bis 120°C |
| 147 mm Abstand Druckpunkt(e) |
| 2 mm Eckenradius Haltenut |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Berührungswinkel 35 ° |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 400 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 400 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 11.8 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 4 000 r/min |
| Kontakttyp Vierpunktlager |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Passungsanordnung Kein(e) |
| Statische Tragzahl 570 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 570 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171538 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-05 |
| max.2.5 mm Rundungsradius |
| min.164 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
DON'T SLEEP ON THESE DIAPERS! (but your baby should)
Size: Size 3 (40 Count)
I was skeptical at first trying out the plush version of this diaper because I thought the mama bear gentle touch was just OK and you can find a better diaper for the same price point. I saw these on prime day for the same price as the gentle touch and said why not. I was very, very impressed. They are soft and flexible with a satin-like exterior; similar to the feel of a hello bello diaper. The plush version definitely feels more quality than the papery gentle touch ones. I first tested the absorbency using 12 oz of water, waited ten minutes and dabbed dabbed dabbed. Seriously NO moisture! In comparison to the gentle touch diaper that had obvious moisture after the same test. I put them to use on my baby, who just for reference is 19lbs, for an overnight and the diaper did not leak and was only damp in the morning, not wet! Amazing. She is a moderate wetter but I still think that performance is great because in comparison to gentle touch, the diaper was wet on the inside after only three hours and I had to consistently use diaper cream so rash wouldn't develop; I would have never used the gentle touch as an overnight diaper. Seriously, for .21 a diaper for size three these diapers are a steal. DONT SLEEP ON THIS DEAL, PICK UP SOME MAMA BEAR PLUSH DIAPERS!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 23, 2024
★★★★★ 3
Not the Same 🤍
Size: Size 2 (184 Count)
I loved the Mama Bear size 1 diapers, so I expected the “plush” size 2s to be the same. Unfortunately, they feel completely different. These seem thinner and not quite as absorbent as the size 1 regular pack.
The design is also really busy, which makes the wetness indicator harder to see at a quick glance. With babies, that little line matters more than you’d think.
I’ll still finish the pack, but I’m not sure I’d repurchase this “plush” version. If you’re choosing between them, I’d recommend sticking with the regular pack instead. In comparison, Huggies still perform better than these for us. 🤍✨
They don’t hold blowouts at all but they do fit well. They’re also not stretchy. I noticed the print on my baby’s legs.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great cost efficient option
Size: Size 4 (36 Count)
I switched over from Millie Moon and really like these. They’re affordable, don’t have harmful additives, and are soft and gentle on my babies. Holds a significant amount and doesn’t leak even on overnight wears. I like the simple non character design as well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Every other diaper leaked
Size: Size 7 (92 Count)
I bought these diapers because they were the cheapest available to buy with a gift card my family was given. Normally I use the bulk store brands. The diapers were very hit and miss. It varies from diaper to diaper even in a pack. My son does urinate heavily but even before he would get anywhere near a “full” diaper it would leak! Leading to wet pants and messes. We’ve never had this problem with other diaper brands. Even our cloth diapers hold better than half of these did. For note he falls below the max size for these diapers by at least 5 lbs. I don’t plan on repurchasing these because of the leaking issue. Beyond that they were easy to use like any other diaper, didn’t cause diaper rash, held together, but was subpar in absorption.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 19, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Smells great
Great smells amazing
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2026