Pay in installments of $11.93 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 1 - Aug 6
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
NU2206ECJ SKFTechnische Basisdaten Auendurchmesser: 62 mm Axiallastfaktor: Y: 0. 4 Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 6. 1 kN Gewicht: 268 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 14 000 r min Grenzwert: e: 0. 3 Herstellungsland: Deutschland Minimallastfaktor: kr0. 2 Referenzdrehzahl: 13 000 r min Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 Erweiterte technische Daten 37. 5 mm Kantenabstand loser Bordring 62 mm Auendurchmesser Anzahl der Reihen 1 Auendurchmesser 62 mm Axiale Verschiebbarkeit In both directions
Technische Basisdaten
| Außendurchmesser: 62 mm |
| Axiallastfaktor: Y: 0.4 |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 6.1 kN |
| Gewicht: 268 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 14 000 r/min |
| Grenzwert: e: 0.3 |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Minimallastfaktor: kr0.2 |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 13 000 r/min |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 5000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 37.5 mm Kantenabstand loser Bordring |
| 62 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Außendurchmesser 62 mm |
| Axiale Verschiebbarkeit In both directions |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 55 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 55 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 0.268 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 14 000 r/min |
| Loser Bord Kein(e/r) |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Referenzdrehzahl 13 000 r/min |
| Statische Tragzahl 49 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 49 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171505 |
| max.0.6 mm Radius der Rundung |
| max.1 mm Radius der Rundung |
| max.1.8 mm Zulässige axiale Verschiebbarkeit |
| max.36.1 mm Durchmesser der Distanzhülse |
| min.0.6 mm Kantenabstand |
| min.1 mm Kantenabstand |
| min.34.3 mm Durchmesser der Distanzhülse |
| min.39 mm Durchmesser der WelleKeine/ Nicht vorhandenlauffläche |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Really nice and sturdy. These are all I use now.
Size: 400 Count, Size: 400 Count
I bought these to put Caster oil on my eye lashes. They are so nice and sturdy, I have started using them for everything. The cotton head is tightly wound, so it doesn’t fall apart when used. The stick is not plastic, but is strong and really takes a lot of force to bend. 100% Organic.
So long Johnson and Johnson Qtips, which have degraded since 2020. They use to be more like these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Not great quality
Size: 400 Count
Some of them are too thin and can’t be used for ears, not soff
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Handy
Size: 400 Count
The product immediately goes on your bathroom counter. If you order other brands in drugstores they come in an inconvenient box dispenser. This one makes it easy to access.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Highly recommend
Size: 400 Count
I wanted something with a smaller, more compact tip for eye makeup application and clean up and these are perfect! Q-tips have gotten so irregular and sloppy, not at all like they used to be made. Cliganic has stepped up and filled the void nicely👍🏻 Great packaging too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Very nice cotton swabs
Size: 400 Count
Impressed with the quality. It is difficult to open the box and the swabs are difficult to remove as they are packed very tightly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026