Pay in installments of $38.36 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
HS7009-C-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191841310000 Gewicht: 270 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 75,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 16,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 16,00 C 15 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 27 Innenmae: mm 45,00 P4S Boundary
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0191841310000 |
| Gewicht: 270 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 75,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 16,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 16,00 |
| C 15° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.27 |
| Innenmaße: mm 45,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 12300 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 7500 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 130 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 853 N |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 51 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 34,3 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 74,3 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 7.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 12.300 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 790 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 12.300 N |
| E tk max 58,2 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 56,7 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 58,2 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 54,6 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 790 N |
| F V H 259 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 43 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 853 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 130 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 58,2 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,3 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 54,6 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 56,7 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 7.500 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 43 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 259 N |
| c a H 74,3 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 34,3 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 51 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,3 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,249 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Agradecida por el producto por mis nietos
Size: 5 Ounce (Pack of 2)
Magnífico
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Works well to prevent sunburn and stays on while working.
Size: 6 Ounce (Pack of 1), Style: Spray
This sunscreen is great! I've worked outside in New Mexico sun for the past few years and this is a life saver. Goes on evenly and doesn't come off while I'm working in the heat.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sunscreen 100 proof
Size: 6 Ounce (Pack of 1), Style: Spray
Works great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Fabulous, especially for sensitive skin and those with aversion to textures.
Size: 6 Ounce (Pack of 1), Style: Spray
Keeps my skin from turning UGLIER.
THIS actually WORKS. I do not wish to be any tanner than I come naturally, and this is the BEST sunscreen I've ever used. I do use a wipe to remove the overspray from my eye area.
It does not irritate my incredibly sensitive skin, and sprays on easily..like a dream. No more sandy spf moments!..I can't stand that creamy+oily stuff all over my hands then throw in a little sand - now we have a sensory concern..NOT WITH THIS STUFF!! Highly recommend.
Easy to use. KeyWest rays had nothing on this..we came back slightly tan, not burnt, and not a looking like a different ethicity. Reapply as recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Best Sunscreen Ever
Size: 6 Ounce (Pack of 1), Style: Spray, Size: 6 Ounce (Pack of 1), Style: Spray
BEST. SUNSCREEN. EVER.
Seriously. My skin is paper-white and I'm highly tattooed, so sun safety is very important to me. 100 SPF for total protection is unbeatable and I have yet to burn even a little. I'm also very texture-sensitive so I can't stand thick, gloopy, sticky lotions. This one actually sprays on clear, soaks in right away, is light, and even a little bit refreshing. The spray mechanism also makes it easier to get my back without help. There's no off-putting smell, no mess, no problems. I do reapply if I'm out for a while so I'll need to reorder soon, but I'm not mad about it at all. It's very affordable compared to the alternatives and entirely worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2023