![DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE P REAR 0250914-P [Compatibility List in Desc.]](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0644/3486/4197/files/main_ph_pre_e90728c1-0b7d-4007-810b-7c756bdddd25.jpg?v=1742327081)
Pay in installments of $14.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 23 - Jul 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
DIXCEL BRAKE PAD TYPE P REAR 0250914-P [Compatibility List in Desc.]Brand DIXCEL Product Number 0250914 P Compatible Car #REF! Product Description Model Grade: 2. 5 Td5 4. 0 V8 _x000D_ _x000D_ Premium type _x000D_ Premium type brake pads, the fusion of reasonable pricing and brake performance _x000D_ Performance brake pads for the price similar to OEM brake pads _x000D_ Improved brake performance, decrease in brake dust. _x000D_ The same long pad life as the OEM brake pads _x000D_ Even higher brake performance by
| Brand | DIXCEL |
| Product Number | 0250914-P |
| Compatible Car | #REF! |
| Product Description | Model Grade: 2.5 Td5 / 4.0 V8 _x000D_ _x000D_ Premium type _x000D_ Premium-type brake pads, the fusion of reasonable pricing and brake performance _x000D_ Performance brake pads for the price similar to OEM brake pads _x000D_ Improved brake performance, decrease in brake dust. _x000D_ The same long pad life as the OEM brake pads _x000D_ Even higher brake performance by changing to DIXCEL brake discs at the same time as your brake pads! _x000D_ Price for European & American Cars: Front :: JPY10,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Rear :: JPY8,000 ~ (w / o tax) _x000D_ Friction Materials: Ceramic fiber / Copper Free (2021 regulations) _x000D_ Max u: 0.58 _x000D_ Ave u: 0.40 _x000D_ Min u: 0.39 _x000D_ Applicable Stages: Street Compatible Vehicles: LAND ROVER DISCOVERY (II) LT56 / LT56A / LT94A 99/5 ~ 05/05 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER (II) LP42D / LP46D / LP58 / LP60D 94 ~ 02/04 |
| Remarks | The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only. The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use. _x000D_ DIXCEL is NOT responsible for any damage that may occur from using the Premium-type brake pads on a race circuit. LAND ROVER DISCOVERY (ii) LT56 / LT56A / LT94A 99/5 ~ 05/05:.. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER (ii) LP42D / LP46D / LP58 / LP60D 94 ~ 02/04:. The Premium-type brake pads are for street-use only The pads are NOT designed for circuit-use. |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A protective formula that protects and radiates skin all day
Color: Light Beige
I like the pressed foundation for smooth and bright look on face.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Only for the pale skinned ones
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Great coverage and texture! However, it left a white cast over olive toned skin. I looked sick. But looked perfect on my pasty redhead daughter.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great everyday sunscreen
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Really impressed with this sunscreen. It’s a bit thick going on, but a little goes a long way. Once applied, it feels lightweight, not greasy or oily at all. Provides great coverage and protection, definitely a great product I’ll keep using.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
The BEST sunscreen I've found
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
This is my MUST HAVE sunscreen. I've had almost every type of skin cancer (thankfully, caught early), so I NEED good sun protection, especially on my face. I have very fair skin. This product leaves a bit of a white cast, but after a short period of time, that white case is absorbed. The white cast of a mineral sunscreen might look chalky on a person with darker skin. The BEST thing about this sunscreen is I can put it on my eyelids and under my eyes, it doesn't irritate my eyes AT ALL. The other well-known sunscreen I used for a long time really made my eyes sting if a bit got into them. This is my favorite sunscreen of all time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Solid mineral SPF with light coverage effect
Style: SPF 50, Size: 3 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
I’m used to La Roche-Posay’s chemical sunscreens, so this was my first time trying their mineral version. The texture is actually quite nice for a mineral formula. It spreads evenly and doesn’t feel gritty or chalky. That said, it does take a bit longer to fully absorb compared to chemical SPFs.
I’m already very pale, and I still notice a slight white cast. It’s not extreme, but it’s there. To be fair, most mineral sunscreens tend to do this, especially those using zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.
Interestingly, on my skin it almost behaves like a very light tinted sunscreen. It slightly blurs and softens the appearance of minor blemishes and redness, which I appreciate on minimal-makeup days.
It provides broad-spectrum SPF 50 protection and feels gentle on sensitive skin. I haven’t experienced irritation, pilling, or breakouts. It layers reasonably well over moisturizer but benefits from being applied in thin, well-blended layers, which adds some time to my morning routine so it's a little inconvenient.
Overall, it’s a solid mineral option with good protection. Just expect a bit more blending time and a subtle cast.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026