SKU: 81188763500

Sartorius 14069--50------N Nutrient Pad with Filter Sabouraud NPS&gridded MF, 0.45 High Flow, ⌀50 mm, 100/pk

Sale price$165.88 Regular price$184.31
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $46.08 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sartorius 14069--50------N Nutrient Pad with Filter Sabouraud NPS&gridded MF, 0.45 High Flow, ⌀50 mm, 100/pkSartorius Nutrient Pad Sets have been used successfully in the membrane filter method for more than 30 years. Practical and easy to handle, Nutrient Pads reduce labor and simplify many microbiological testing procedures. Microorganisms require the appropriate culture media for optimal growth. Nutrient Pad Sets are sterile, dehydrated culture media. Once they are moistened with 3. 0 3. 5 ml of sterile and demineralized (or pure ) water they are ready

Sartorius Nutrient Pad Sets have been used successfully in the membrane filter method for more than 30 years. Practical and easy to handle, Nutrient Pads reduce labor and simplify many microbiological testing procedures. Microorganisms require the appropriate culture media for optimal growth. Nutrient Pad Sets are sterile, dehydrated culture media. Once they are moistened with 3.0 – 3.5 ml of sterile and demineralized (or pure ) water they are ready-to-use immediately. The level of moisture is optimal when an excess ring of water surrounding the NPS is visible.
The standard NPS box contains 100 sterile Nutrient Pads, each of which is individually inserted in a petri dish and sterilized. Ten each of these petri dishes are sealed in an aluminum bag. This special packaging in bags protects the sensitive formula constituents of the Nutrient Pad during transport and storage from fluctuations in humidity and temperature. As a result, it guarantees the high quality of our NPS throughout their entire shelf life up to 24 months. This makes the Sartorius Nutrient Pads Sets unique: No other ready-to-use culture media around the globe assures such consistently high quality and reproducible results up to 24 months.
Compliance with International Standards: Currently, Sartorius offers more than 30 different Nutrient Pad Set types to meet the diverse requirements of microbiological analysis. Aside from the European drinking water directive, they comply with other international regulations and recommendations: international pharmacopoeias, DIN and ISO standards, the American Standards for Water and Foods, mineral water regulations, brewery guidelines, such as MEBAC or EBC, and recommendations of the food industry, such as LMBG, NCA and ICUMSA, etc.
Includes Membrane Filters: All Nutrient Pad Set types are supplied with the appropriate membrane filters, which are also individually sterile packaged. Nutrient Pad Sets are also available with Microsart® e.motion Membrane Filters which are specially designed for the Microsart® e.motion Dispenser and can be conveniently inserted. The membrane filters are then automatically removed from their sterile package. All membrane filters, tailored to meet the special requirements of microbial detection, are available with 47 or 50 mm diameter.
Trouble-free storage up to 24 month
Compliance with international standards and references
Validation guide available
Highly versatile -multiple applications
Economical – no time consuming and labor intensive preparation of nutrient media (sterilization, cleaning etc.)
Easy handling – no need for comprehensive microbiological testing equipment

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 81188763500

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
TMB
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
OBSESSED!!!!!
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
I gave it 5 stars because it deserves the flowers. I do wish the paper was a little better quality. I think it would help make the pictures pop more. Regardless, this book is worth every penny. I haven't found anything else like it. The book is clear, concise, and isn't bogged down with too many details - just the facts m'am. It's a perfect starting reference to send someone down 101 different rabbit holes. I hope someday he puts out a hardback version on thick, slick paper with beautiful, glossy photographs. That would be lovely. For now, this will more than suffice. You get just enough about each artifact to get you going. From there, you can decide how to use your favorite search engine.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
allison
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
A great reference for Biblical factual archeology
Format: Paperback
I just received this book and I am so excited. It is a great tool and reference for Biblical studies. Each artifact has a great photograph next to the quick eye catching dates, discovery, period, keywords and Biblical passage. Then a brief but to the point description. It is simple and effective. Very easy to refer when reading your Bible or if you are just interested in archeology. Each artifact is about 2 pages and nothing more which is perfect for references. What a great book!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2025
S
Verified Purchase
sandyrouse
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent and in-depth archeologic finds that authenticate Bible history.
Format: Paperback
Archeology is proving much of the Bible's history as true. This book really delves into various sites and provides a lot of detail. My type of reading.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Angie Criss
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great information and pictures
Format: Paperback
Great information on Biblical sites, beautiful pictures, and a pretty book as well. I gave several of these to my family for Christmas. Everyone seemed to love them. The only thing I will caution you about is that the book is small.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mareadas
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
Knowledgeable and delectable book.
Format: Paperback
This book shows an excellent archaeological evidence of the Bible accuracy of places, names, events, etc. and proving for the Christians that the Bible is a historical document as well as the inspired inerrant word of God. The majority of the book is interesting and delectable, I mean, the pages where the author presents archaeological facts such as the artifacts and their correlation with people, places times, events and practices recorded in the Bible. But I do not like when the author make personal assumptions and do not present any proof of that. He says: it probably be…. it may be… Here I show three cases of this conjectures;: 1.The author seems to affirm that the triumphal entry of Jesus into Jerusalem, or at least, the name of this event, was derived from the Roman triumph celebration. He says (page 231), regarding to the Roman Empire and the life of Jesus: “By the time of Jesus, the requirements and meaning of a triumphal entry had shifted slightly from its earlier roots associating it with a conquering hero, as it became even more significant and representative of kingship and divinity”. He continues to say: “In ancient Roman culture, a triumphant victor, known as vir triumphalis (“man of triumph”) would enter the city in a celebration parade wearing the laurel wreath and a purple garment, which identified him with the royal and the divine, while riding in a chariot pulled by four horses, alluding to Sol the sun god”.  But if we compare the Roman triumph celebration with the entry of Jesus into Jerusalem described in the Bible, it is not derived from the Roman culture but is the exact fulfillment of the prophesy of Zechariah 9:9. I do not see any correlation between the two celebration; Jesus did not ride a horse but a donkey to signify peace, meekness and humility. It was not a pompous entrance of a conquering hero or king wearing a expensive garment and royal crown. 2.Even though, it is not possible to identify the location of the tomb of Jesus with absolute certainty; the author states (page 199) that the tomb of Jesus is located at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre possible based on “the restoration work to the edicule and an arcosolium tomb from the Roman period found in the church of the Holy Sepulchre”. The author also affirms without giving any proof that: “Christians in Jerusalem then passed down a continuous memory of the location of the tomb (of Jesus) from the time of the burial and resurrection in AD33 until construction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was started in about AD326”. But where are the records of that time? The author probably based his statement on Eusebius who lived in the 3rd and 4th centuries AD. According to the history , the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was built by the Roman Emperor Constantine around 326 AD, when her mother the Queen Helena, wanted to replace the pagan temples with Christian churches; she met the Bishop Macarious of Jerusalem who determined the location where Jesus had been buried at the place where was a temple to the Greek goddess Venus. At the beginning of the construction of the church, a rock-cut tomb was found there and an edicule was built to protect the site. But later the edicule was destroyed and rebuild. More tombs has been found under this church. How to be sure or verify that this rock-cut tomb was the one where Jesus was buried? 3.The author is biased with respect to the Masoretic Text, he make a statement but does not support it with any evidence in this regard. Writing about the Dead Sea Scrolls (Page 173) he states: “And certain passages in the Masoretic text seem to have been intentionally modified to match ideas and theology of medieval Judaism.” it is a bad accusation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2021

recommand products