Pay in installments of $21.25 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Vintage 1940s Red Plaid DressLovely cotton plaid dress from the 1940s or early 1950s. Lightweight cotton fabric in red, grey and soft blue. Perfect for warmer days! Dress is sleeveless, princess seam, closes up the side with snaps, and ties in the back. Arms and neckline are bound in self fabric. Label No label, likely a homemade piece. Measurements Bust 35" Waist 28" comfortably, can tie a little smaller Shoulder to shoulder 15" Length 44" Condition Very good condition, strong
Lovely cotton plaid dress from the 1940s or early 1950s. Lightweight cotton fabric in red, grey and soft blue. Perfect for warmer days! Dress is sleeveless, princess seam, closes up the side with snaps, and ties in the back. Arms and neckline are bound in self fabric.
Label - No label, likely a homemade piece.
Measurements
Bust - 35"
Waist - 28" comfortably, can tie a little smaller
Shoulder to shoulder - 15"
Length - 44"
Condition - Very good condition, strong and very wearable. There is an old repair near the hem where the dress has been patched with matching fabric. Nicely done and not noticeable when worn. In the same area there are a couple small holes splits in the fabric. One tie is starting to pull at the seam just a tiny bit. One tiny hole at front of skirt.
Buyers should expect all vintage and antique items to have some wear. They may not be 100% free of minor defects, as they have been loved already. Any imperfections will be described to the best of my knowledge.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Looked good
Color: Black
It was a gift, so I don't have anything to say about it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Black
The best magnetic phone holder
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Does not hold as advertised
Color: Black
When the dash got hot from the sun, the glue gave way and everything ended up on the floor. Couldn’t send it back because the time limit had passed but I don’t use it
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2026
★★★★★ 5
What a Cute Egg… Err Flower
Easy to install and easy to use! It’s as simple as turning two knobs to tighten onto the screen and placement of the arm.
So adorable and has a strong magnet. Looks a little like an egg but who doesn’t love eggs and daisies?
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Good mount for tesla cars
Build
The design is a very different when compared to regular magnetic mounts. Some people will like it and others wouldn't. This looks like a daisy flower and can be mounted to any tesla car.
Material
The phone holder itself seems to be made of good materials, and offers a sturdy mount that remains secure in place. It does take some cranking to tighten and there is always a worry of over tighetening and breaking it.
Functionality
Installation and removal are straightforward and quick. The magnet provides a strong hold for my Samsung Ultra, and keeps it firmly in position during drives.
Value for Money (VFM)
At $16, the product offers good value, however at a tad higher price. Would recommend only to those who like the looks and need the mounting functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2025