Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
BBK 79-93 Mustang Front Bump Steer Tie Rod End KitThe effect of bump steer is for the wheels to toe in or toe out when the suspension moves up or down. Bump steer is undesirable because the suspension is steering the car instead of the driver. To fix bump steer especially when lowering a car, you need to alter the height of the outer tie rod relative to the steering rack with adjustable tie rod ends, also known as a bump steer kit. BBK Performance Mustang Bump Steer Kits are available to fit 1979 93,
The effect of bump steer is for the wheels to toe-in or toe-out when the suspension moves up or down. Bump steer is undesirable because the suspension is steering the car instead of the driver. To fix bump steer especially when lowering a car, you need to alter the height of the outer tie-rod relative to the steering rack with adjustable tie-rod ends, also known as a bump steer kit. BBK Performance Mustang Bump Steer Kits are available to fit 1979-93, 1994-04 and 2005-14 Ford Mustangs. These BBK Bump steer Kits will correct the front geometry of the Mustang suspension after you have lowered the it with a Mustang lowering spring kit.This bump steer kit will offer improved steering and better handling. These kits can also be used to replace stock factory tie rod ends that wear out instead of replacing the ball joints.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 2440 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Never got to try it because it was broken
Color: Black
Came with a broken piece and is taking forever to get a refund…there wasn’t an option for a replacement
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Room divider
Color: Black, Color: Black
It was much simpler than anticipated. I don't think it's very sturdy and it lacks weight, but it's attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black
This is very sturdy and great quality. Its quite cheap for what your getting to it’s not cheap thin like plastic it feels thick and you could put a LITTLE weight on it it’s stable and protects your privacy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well.
Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely.
One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs.
The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers.
Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster.
Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality.
Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one.
The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy.
Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex.
The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one.
The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026