SKU: 64365045905

2 Boxs- Thuốc FUBENZON

Sale price$17.10 Regular price$19.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $4.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

2 Boxs- Thuốc FUBENZONThuc Fubenzon l thuc ty giun c s dng kh ph bin. Bi vit ny, Trung Tm Thuc Central Pharmacy xin gi n qu bn c thng tin v Fubenzon. 1 Thnh phn Thnh phn: Mi vin nn thuc Fubenzon c thnh phn nh sau: Hot cht chnh l Mebendazole hm lng 500mg. T dc va 1 vin. (T dc bao gm: Manitol, aspartam, mi chocolate, mu cam E110, mu eurolake green, erythrosine lake, magnesi stearat, vanilin, PVP K30). 2 Tc dng Ch nh ca thuc Fubenzon 2. 1 Tc dng ca thuc Fubenzon Mebendazol c

Thuốc Fubenzon là thuốc tẩy giun được sử dụng khá phổ biến. Bài viết này, Trung Tâm Thuốc Central Pharmacy xin gửi đến quý bạn đọc thông tin về Fubenzon.

1 Thành phần

Thành phần:

Mỗi viên nén thuốc Fubenzon có thành phần như sau:

  • Hoạt chất chính là Mebendazole hàm lượng 500mg.
  • Tá dược vừa đủ 1 viên.

(Tá dược bao gồm: Manitol, aspartam, mùi chocolate, màu cam E110, màu eurolake green, erythrosine lake, magnesi stearat, vanilin, PVP K30).

2 Tác dụng - Chỉ định của thuốc Fubenzon

2.1 Tác dụng của thuốc Fubenzon

Mebendazol có hoạt lực kháng giun khá hiệu quả với các loại giun đặc biệt là các loại giun tròn. Mebendazol ức chế quá trình tạo thành các tiểu cấu trúc hình ống ở hầu hết các loại giun tròn qua đó làm cho giun bị thiếu hụt trầm trọng và dẫn đến cạn kiệt Glucose.

Thuốc có khả năng tác dụng ở nhiều giai đoạn trong vòng đời của giun: giai đoạn trứng, ấu trùng và cả giai đoạn trưởng thành ở giun đũa, giun tóc, giun mỏ, giun móc, giun kim.

Khi sử dụng Mebendazol liều cao, thuốc có thể tác dụng lên cả nang sán ở mức độ nhất định. 

Qua một số nghiên cứu gần đây, Mebendazole được ghi nhận là có tác dụng hiệu quả tiêu diệt trùng roi hơn cả Metronidazole. Tuy nhiên vẫn chưa có kết luận chính xác trên nghiên cứu lâm sàng. 

2.2 Chỉ định của thuốc Fubenzon

Chỉ định dùng Fubenzon 500mg cho những trường hợp sau: 

  • Fubenzon được chỉ định để điều trị nhiễm một hay nhiễm nhiều loại giun cùng lúc như: giun đũa, giun tóc, giun kim, giun móc, giun lươn.
  • Người bị nhiễm sán ở giai đoạn trứng và nang của chúng.

3 Cách dùng - Liều dùng của thuốc Fubenzon

3.1 Liều dùng của thuốc Fubenzon

Liều dùng của thuốc: Liều dùng khác nhau đối với từng đối tượng và từng loại giun sán.

Giun kim: Uống một liều duy nhất 100mg. Cần phải uống liều nhắc lại sau 2 tuần, vì bệnh nhân bị nhiễm giun kim rất dễ bị tái trở lại.

Nhiễm giun đũa, giun tóc, giun móc và nhiễm nhiều giun: Ngày uống 2 lần, liều mỗi lần là 100mg, uống liên tục trong vòng 3 ngày, hoặc có thể uống một liều duy nhất 500mg. 

Nhiễm giun lươn: Ngày uống 2 lần, liều mỗi lần uống là 20mg, uống liên tục trong vòng 3 ngày.

Nhiễm Capillaria philippinensis: Ngày uống 2 lần, liều mỗi lần uống là 200mg, uống liên tục trong vòng 21 ngày.

Nhiễm nang sán: Ngày uống một lần, liều mỗi lần uống là 40mg/1 kg thể trọng, uống trong 1 - 6 tháng. 

Mời quý bạn đọc xem thêm: Thuốc Benda 500mg là thuốc gì, giá bao nhiêu tiền? có tác dụng gì?

3.2 Cách dùng thuốc Fubenzon

Thuốc dùng đường uống, và được khuyến cáo là nên sử dụng với đồ ăn có nhiều chất béo để tăng độ hấp thu cũng như sinh khả dụng của thuốc.

Chỉ sử dụng Mebendazol nếu không có Albendazol do khả năng hấp thu của albendazol được chứng minh là tốt hơn mebendazol.

Có 2 cách sử dụng thuốc:

  • Cách thứ nhất: nhai trực tiếp viên thuốc, sau đó uống với nhiều nước.
  • Cách thứ hai: nghiền nhỏ viên thuốc và trộn với thức ăn (cách này phù hợp với trẻ nhỏ).
  • Chỉ sử dụng thuốc còn hạn sử dụng và thuốc không có dấu hiệu bị giảm chất lượng.
  • Nên tẩy giun định kì cho trẻ nhỏ, đảm bảo vệ sinh ăn uống, cũng như nơi ở.

4 Chống chỉ định

Phụ nữ mang thai (đặc biệt là mang thai 3 tháng đầu).

Trẻ em chưa đủ 2 tuổi.

Người bị bệnh ảnh hưởng đến chức năng gan.

Người mẫn cảm với bất kì thành phần nào của thuốc.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 64365045905

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kev21392
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
I love Dr Jen products
Item Package Quantity: 1, Item Package Quantity: 1
This is my favorite dry mouth gel that I’ve tried. I sleep with my mouth open and take medication at night that causes dry mouth so I have zero saliva during sleep. This gel has helped the most. Sometimes I wake up in middle of night and my mouth will still be dry so I reapply. The taste is very mild , I love that it has nano hydroxyapatite as I have gerd and like the extra enamel support.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
eden
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
A treasure: surprisingly easy read for being so well researched and referenced
was recommended by Chris Kresser (Healthy Sceptic blog). I admit I was skeptical: the titel, at first glance, comes across as pretentious, and the front page has a weird 80s feel to it. Anyway, Chris knows his stuff, so I bought it. The PHD book is priceless. Yes, this is the best book about diet. I had been on a Paleo diet for a month when I got the book. I was motivated to change my diet, but after reading the book, first quickly once, and then more carefully a second time, I was even more motivated. I was convinced that I had to make a change for life. Other reviewers have summarized the contents well, so I will not. Eliminate processed foods, grains (except rice), legumes and most sugars. Stick to high fat diary. Bottom line in terms of macronutrient ratios is: not too much carbs, plenty of good fats, and ideally some protein restriction. I believe better authors could not have been found. Even though Shou-Ching Jaminet is a cancer researcher, none of them came to this from a medical or nutrition background, which is probably an advantage. They have experienced chronic disease themselves, and were committed to find solutions and understand pathways that were not well understood. They have enormous intellectual capacity (scrutinizing studies from PubMed the way they do is, well, impressive). They are open minded. And, not the least, I think they are driven by not only intellectual curiosity, but alturism, which, gives the whole project a very humane and caring feel to it. What is the difference between this diet and the Paleo diet? There are many variations of the Paleo diet, but Cordain at least recommends lean meats, which is the opposite of what the PHD recommends. The PHD "allows" full fat diary and rice, which is not recommended by most other Paleo diets. The PHD also has a rather specific macronutrient ratio recommendation. The results? Well, I started on a Paleo / GAPS protocol about a month before I got this book, so I cannot really say that all the improvements I have had can be attributed to this book. And after 48 hours without any processed foods, grains, legumes, sugar (apart from low carb from starches) and diary, I went from standing, sitting and walking with great joint pain, to only slight pain. A skin condition I had improved as well. Two weeks after I got the book, I tried using almost only rice as my carbohydrate source for 10 days. That increased my joint pain slightly. I think I in any case might have been in the high range of the carbohydrate intake during this period, which might be the reason for the change to the worse, rather than the type of starch I ate. The other thing though, is that once I started eating rice, and maybe too generous portions, my carb cravings were significantly elevated. I will try to stick mostly to sweet potatoes, taro, pumpkin, carrots, zucchini, berries and fruits (in the morning) for carbs. I have started implementing their supplement regime. I was skeptical at first, because, like many people, I prefer getting micronutrients from food, not supplements. But I decided to try since I had some heath issues and blood panel results that had to be improved. After about two weeks, I feel a bit better. I have a bit more energy and my head feels clearer. Am I skeptical to anything? Not much. - As I said, they convinced me to try their supplement regime and I do not regret it. I think anyone with an autoimmune condition, chronic disease - even a suspected chronic infection - should do so. For those who are fortunate to be 100% healthy and full of energy, well, maybe they do not need to take all the supplements if the diet is very dialed in. - At first I thought the macronutrient ratios were a bit too rigid. After reading the book a second time, I felt they presented a convincing argument. I will never weigh and measure my food, so I do not know exactly what my macro ratios look like, but the book provides very useful guidance. - Then, rice. I would have liked to see a bit more on why they think rice is a "safe" grain. Also, since it is not very nutrient dense, I think it gets a bit too much favorable mention. Eating food with low nutrient density and then taking lots of supplements does not sound like a perfect health diet. But this is a detail - people do not have to eat a lot of rice on this diet, and it is good to know that it is pretty okay to eat it from time to time. I have used their blog a lot, for tweaking my supplement regime, for recipes etc. It is an excellent companion to the book. For the next edition, I have the following wishes: - An index - Improvements in lay-out (sorry, but it is incredibly ugly): margins needed, footnotes can be smaller, table of contents more reader friendly etc. - A chapter with summary recommendations for common autoimmune conditions and chronic infections. - A bit more info on diary. Why high fat diary is okay for most people, and for what conditions diary should be eliminated completely (and why). Conclusion: I honestly think this book is such a treasure. I have translated and adapted the main recommendations into my native language for my family. It is difficult to persuade anyone about diet, but it is difficult not to try with people you really love. I do not doubt for a second that following the recommendations contained in this book can go a long way in reversing, even curing diseases, and definitely preventing diseases. I feel very grateful to Paul and Shou-Ching Jaminet. Thank you.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2011
I
Verified Purchase
Isaac J. Knoflicek
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Changed My Life
Format: Hardcover
The year the Green Bay Packers drafted BJ Raji I remember being extremely shocked that I weighed almost the same as him (319 was my peak). Winter of 2009 I started riding a stationary bike fairly regularly, Spring of 2010 I started bike commuting regularly and by summer of 2012 I was down 60 pounds. As I became more interested in fitness I was more interested in how the body handled different kinds of macro nutrients. I did a few random Google searches for a book on the topic and in June of 2012 I found a review of the original PHD edition which made it sound like what I wanted. I wasn't looking to change my diet, I had a lot of joint pain and was very susceptible to binge eating/drinking, but I was loosing weight so overall I was happy. I remember reading the first chapter where it explained the "gotchyas" like having to give up wheat and laughing out loud at the though of it. I was a complete carb fiend to the point where I'd been baking my own homemade artisan breads. I found the book to be a quick read, it took me only a week. I definitely went a bit cross eyed at some of the more complex biology, but overall I found it as entertaining as it was informative, and when I'd finished I thought "What the hell", I'll try it for a week or two and see what happens. My first weekend was a little rough because I went out with some friends and because bar we were at only had fried foods, I ended up drinking way too much on an empty stomach. My first attempt at baking salmon the next day was promptly thrown up, but fortunately it didn't give me a bad taste for the fish. In only a few days I started to notice how different being hungry felt. I'd always made it a point to have breakfast and not eat again until Lunch, but I usually had a few spikes of intense hunter which I had to fight past. On this diet the hunger was there but it was more of a casual suggestion. Needless to say I had such an easy time on my two week trial that I kept the diet. That summer I lost as much weight as I had the previous two combined. I feel much more even in terms of mood, my mind feels sharper, I have a nice even energy level all day. I had hoped my joint pain would clear up faster, but it has definitely gotten better as well. I'd been wanting to reread the PHD for a while, but I knew the new edition was coming out soon so I held off. I was aware of some of the changes from following the blog (which is excellent, it's such a trip to have Paul give expert answers to your questions personally), but still wanted to go through the whole thing again. The new version is a definite improvement. Like I'd mentioned some of the biology in the original edition, particularly on the different types of fats, came early and confused and discouraged me a bit. This version they hook you in with simpler explanations and do a better job of building up the biology as you go. Also after the original edition I had to do a lot of fine tuning to the diet based on questions I'd ask Paul on blog, or going back and reading other peoples questions. In this edition they do a much better job of practically spelling out things so its easier to jump in. Finally the reader results that are included in the new edition are a really neat addition. I'd read a lot of them on the blog as well, but they're so amazing and inspiring, sprinkling them into the text the way they did was a really great idea. After finishing this new edition I feel freshly excited about a diet I've been on for half a year. I also feel better about recommending this edition to friends because it reads so much easier. I highly recommend this book to anyone looking to gain health, loose weight, or even just learn about how their bodies work.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 29, 2012
G
Verified Purchase
gp2x
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
I can't believe how much better I feel!
I had been eating (very) low-carb and high-protein for the better part of a decade - and I had gotten a lot of practice arrogantly dismissing suggestions (from any source) that I should change anything about my diet. It is a testimony to the insightfulness of this book that it persuaded me to change. How was I persuaded? * The Jaminets are highly educated (Ph.D.s both), but not they're not nutritionists and are not bound by any party line. * They amass a huge volume of scientific literature in support of their assertions - about 1/3 of every page is journal citations. * They write clearly, and are clearly motivated by a desire to share the keys they've discovered for better health. * Time after time, while reading, I exclaimed "so *that's* why!" - there's an overarching framework they build, and after reading it I have a much broader and deeper understanding of health and nutrition. The changes I made were: 1. Eat a modest amount (15-20%) of calories as carbs from what they call "safe starches" (rice & potatoes in my case.) 2. Eat a large (~70%) of calories from fat. In particular, I consume dramatically more butter (kerrygold!), and I've added a fair bit of coconut oil too. 3. (As a result, the amount of protein I eat has dropped somewhat.) 4. Supplementing with a mix of the vitamins they recommend. 5. Doing a 24-hour fast once a week. Results: (after 1.5 months or so.) 1. I'm no longer "brain-dead" and unable to think in the evenings after work. 2. I no longer have fruit or chocolate cravings. 3. I'm much happier, and wake up looking forward to the day. 4. I've been much more social. 5. The extra starch has not resulted in weight gain. (I always gained weight when eating carbs before.) 6. It looks like the fasting (which I've never tried before) is helping my alertness and also contributing to healthy weight loss. It took less than a week for me to notice dramatic changes. The diet guidelines are straightforward and fit on a page, but the explanatory material is priceless. The Jaminets post on an ongoing basis at their perfecthealthdiet dot com blog as well. I can't recommend this book highly enough.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2011
C
Verified Purchase
Chris Kleeschulte
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Best diet/health book I have ever read
Format: Kindle
For scientifically-minded laypeople, this is an excellent read. I altered my diet because of this book. Using a bit of intuition, it seems much more logical that nature attempts to achieve balance with respect to macro nutrients and vitamins/minerals. I loved Mr. Jaminet's explanation of the relationship of vitamin A,D, and K. I do have about a thousand questions for the author (Paul Jaminet), such as his lower protein recommendations (this differs greatly from a typical gym rat's recommendation of 1 gram of protein per pound of body mass). The book recommends more protein for the athlete, but not at the levels recommended elsewhere (high protein diets). I think Mr. Jaminet and others that are recommending a smaller ratio of protein to fat/carbs are ahead of the game. I find my diet in desperate need of more insoluble fiber, although this book does not treat fiber as being extremely important and advises against too much fiber. I use PGX daily fiber once per day and it had made a big difference for me. All in all, there are 3 big aspects that I would like Mr. Jaminet to weigh in on in future books or other publications. First, please expand more on repairing the health of your gut and the good bacteria that live there. What is the absolute quickest way to optimize gut flora and, subsequently, keep inflammation at a minimum? I understand Mr. Jaminet's stance on legumes, but it seems very contradictory to common sense. From the surface, not eating any legumes would raise my BS flag. Overall, if the answer is "don't eat legumes because you can get all the benefits from other foods and, therefore, better safe than sorry", then this should be considered a dubious argument (I am not saying that this is the argument in the book). To be fair, the book has much more detailed reasons to steer clear of legumes, but I am still a little on the fence about it. Lastly, PHD refers to the Shangri-la diet and using MCT or Coconut oil to suppress appetite, but I would LOVE a detailed scientific explanation of what the body's "setpoint" really is. From my clinical trials (on myself!), this is a huge factor. My body seems to want to be at a set weight and even body fat percentage and it takes quite a bit of effort to lower or raise that setpoint. This applies to the PHD because assertions are made with respect to the body's need for a certain quantity of protein and carbs. How does the setpoint interact with those processes? PROS: * Clearly, Mr. Jaminet or his editors took a technical writing course. This book is written using the active voice and uses a conversational tone. Extremely easy to read! It is simple, direct, clear, and concise. CONS: * This book cites clinical studies as evidence to buttress certain assertions. This is not a problem if you factor in what the study was trying to measure and external variables that would greatly affect the conclusions. Here is an example of clinical studies that are almost worthless (at least from drawing a single conclusion): Patient group A ate such and such and patient group B ate such and such over a 20 year period. The death rate was 11% higher in patient group A, therefore eating what they ate "may" have been the cause of the higher death rate. Drawing conclusions from such a study is really difficult, I think. I am no scientist, but even I can see that these sorts of studies should be used as a starting point for more investigation and not as the final word on a subject.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2013

recommand products