SKU: 67588945062

OSiS+ Curl Retouch - 200ml

Sale price$10.75 Regular price$11.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2.99 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 8 - Aug 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

OSiS+ Curl Retouch - 200mlKen je dat gevoel dat je krullen er de ochtend na het wassen al een beetje moe uitzien? De Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch is precies wat je nodig hebt om ze er weer fris en gedefinieerd uit te laten zien. Deze spray is gemaakt voor krullend en golvend haar en geeft je krullen nieuw leven, zonder dat je meteen de douche in hoeft. Een fles die je voortaan altijd bij de hand wilt hebben. Wat zijn de belangrijkste kenmerken van de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl

Ken je dat gevoel dat je krullen er de ochtend na het wassen al een beetje moe uitzien? De Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch is precies wat je nodig hebt om ze er weer fris en gedefinieerd uit te laten zien. Deze spray is gemaakt voor krullend en golvend haar en geeft je krullen nieuw leven, zonder dat je meteen de douche in hoeft. Een fles die je voortaan altijd bij de hand wilt hebben.

Wat zijn de belangrijkste kenmerken van de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch?

De Curl Retouch is onderdeel van de Schwarzkopf Osis+ curlslijn en combineert verfrissing, verzorging en hittebescherming in één handige spray. Dit zijn de voordelen die je dagelijks merkt:

  • Krullen opfrissen zonder te wassen
  • Lichte hold zonder harde of stijve uitkomst
  • Beschermt je haar tegen hitte van föhn en diffuser
  • Minder pluis, meer definitie
  • Geeft je haar een zichtbare hydratatieboost
  • Vegan formule zonder dierlijke ingrediënten
  • Geschikt voor krullend en golvend haar (2B tot 3C)

Hoe gebruik ik de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch?

  1. Schud de fles goed voor gebruik.
  2. Spray de Curl Retouch op droog of licht vochtig haar.
  3. Verdeel de spray gelijkmatig door je krullen met je vingers of een kam.
  4. Knijp je krullen voorzichtig omhoog om ze te activeren.
  5. Laat je haar drogen in de lucht of gebruik een diffuser.

Wil je nóg meer definitie direct na het wassen? Combineer de Curl Retouch dan met de OSiS+ Curl Jam Defining Gel. Die gel geeft meer grip en glans, terwijl de Curl Retouch jouw krullen de dagen daarna fris houdt.

Hoe werkt de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch precies?

Zodra je de spray aanbrengt, voelt je haar meteen soepeler en zacht aan. Je krullen krijgen weer vorm zonder dat ze stijf of zwaar worden. Dat zachte resultaat komt deels door panthenol, een stof die vocht vasthoudt in je haar en het van binnenuit versterkt. Jojoba-olie omhult elke krul en helpt pluizen te temmen zonder je haar te verzwaren. De curl reviving spray werkt zo goed op droog haar omdat de formule licht genoeg is om te absorberen zonder restjes achter te laten. Als je daarna een diffuser gebruikt, beschermt de spray je haar tegelijk tegen de warmte. Zo behoud je je krullen langer en sla je twee vliegen in één klap. Een slimme keuze als je je haar niet elke dag wilt wassen maar wel elke dag fris wilt lijken.

Is de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch geschikt voor mijn haartype?

De Curl Retouch is gemaakt voor krullend en golvend haar, van lichte golven tot stevige krullen. Heb je heel sterk krullend haar dat veel hold nodig heeft? Dan is deze spray ideaal als aanvulling, maar misschien minder geschikt als enig stylingproduct. Combineer hem in dat geval met de OSiS+ Bouncy Curls Curl Gel with Oil voor extra grip en definitie.

Kan ik de OSiS+ Curl Retouch gebruiken als hittebescherming bij föhnen?

Ja, dat kan. De spray biedt hittebescherming en is ook te gebruiken vóór het föhnen of diffusen. Spray hem op je haar voordat je de warmte erbij pakt en je krullen zijn beschermd. Let op: heb je een stijltang en zoek je een dedicated hittebeschermingsspray daarvoor? Kijk dan ook eens naar de OSiS+ Smooth & Shine Flatliner Heat Protection Spray, die is speciaal gemaakt voor gebruik met stijltangen.

Is de OSiS+ Curl Retouch geschikt voor de Curly Girl Methode?

Niet volledig. De spray bevat geen agressieve sulfaten, maar wél parfum en bepaalde conditionerende stoffen die strikte CG-volgers soms liever vermijden. Volg je de Curly Girl Methode heel strikt? Dan is de spray mogelijk niet helemaal CG-proof. Wil je weten welke producten wél volledig CG-geschikt zijn? Bekijk dan ons Krullend Haar assortiment voor een overzicht.

OSiS+ Curl Retouch of Curl Jam: welke kies jij?

Het verschil zit in het moment van gebruik. De Curl Retouch is een spray die je op droog of licht vochtig haar aanbrengt om je krullen op te frissen, ideaal voor de tweede of derde dag na het wassen. De Curl Jam is een gel die je aanbrengt op nat haar direct na het douchen, voor definitie en glans vanaf het begin. Zoek je iets voor dagelijks opfrissen van je krullen zonder te wassen? Dan is de Curl Retouch jouw ding. Wil je vooral een sterke basis leggen na het wassen? Dan pak je de Curl Jam erbij. Veel mensen met krullend haar gebruiken beide, elk op het juiste moment in hun routine.

Meer weten over dit product?

Heb je een vraag over de Schwarzkopf OSiS+ Curl Retouch of wil je weten of dit product bij jouw haar past? Je bereikt ons via [email protected] of telefonisch tijdens kantooruren. We helpen je graag bij het vinden van de juiste producten voor jouw haarroutine. Schrijf je ook in voor onze nieuwsbrief en ontvang als eerste tips, nieuws en aanbiedingen.

Bestel je voor €35 of meer? Dan sturen we je bestelling gratis op. De Curl Retouch is een slimme toevoeging aan je routine als je krullen er elke dag fris uit wilt laten zien, ook zonder wasbeurt.

Overige informatie

Fabrikant Contact

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
40191 Düsseldorf
Germany

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 67588945062

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
D
Verified Purchase
Dev Girl
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Well written, entertaining - whether this stuff is true or not depends on your opinion.
Format: Paperback
I loved Monroe's first book. *This* book is entertaining, although annoying at times trying to figure out who's talking. I'm silent on whether I believe Monroe's fantastic stories. But if you're okay with that risk, I'd recommend this for both entertainment & perhaps to help unleash some creativity in your self.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 27, 2024
A
Verified Purchase
Andrea Freund
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Changed forever
Format: Kindle
We become so mired in our subjective “reality”. I find it truly beneficial to have a different, perhaps more objective perspective. I hope this enables me to make necessary changes to my journey before its conclusion.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2025
L
Verified Purchase
life is good
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Enlightening!
Format: Paperback
A history of Monroe's discoveries and seminars I took his seminars in the 1993-4 periods Excellent beyond my expectations
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2025
G
Verified Purchase
GiveHerAGoodMunchin
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent trilogy. This is book 2
Format: Paperback
Bob Monroe is an OG OBE G. Love this trilogy. If you can read, read this
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Joe Neal
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Great (excellent) details for the date written
Format: Paperback
NOTE: I toned this version down in 2021 – I was in a bad place when I wrote the original and there were some hostile and entirely inaccurate personal remarks in it. A few tables/charts with a wealth of information have tiny text but most of this was easy enough to read. The photos are poorly produced (at least in the paperback version I reviewed), which is sad given they would be so handy otherwise. This is a classic post-war treatise on the weapons used for ground warfare during World War II by the U.S. Army and as such the Marines. It was first published around 1947 when the war was fresh and doubtlessly numerous technical details were still classified. It was written by a man intimately involved in many design projects. The coverage pretty much explains the breadth. Examples of use are included for some weapons and detailed tables of data for many. He explains references to the "long primer" for the 76-mm gun and the 81-mm mortar T1 extension tube. I am happy to have bought it for that and numerous other details. One thing I missed when I first wrote the original rambling, a bit over the top review back in September 2015 was that the 57mm M1 antitank gun is not mentioned even though it was a key component of Infantry weaponry in 1944-45, sometimes maligned but often quite effective when carefully used as noted in many, many detailed accounts. Perhaps it was skipped because it was a revision of the British 6 pounder and not designed by Barnes men? Yet, it is an example of the issues caused by the pre war budget minders forcing the Army into desperate choices as explained later – and the using arms who decided to adopt it almost at the last minute, late in 1943. Until a weapon is adopted by the Army ammunition cannot be developed – it costs too much money and time to do so. Most of the book is positive and ignores failures, posed from the viewpoint of a proud designer not an actual user. Yet those failures illustrate the issues Ordnance had to deal with during the war. The U.S. invented the bazooka as the 2.36-inch model in 1942 yet the Germans fielded the more powerful 8.8-cm (88mm) model in 1944; and the U.S. did not get the 3.5-inch (90mm) into production-ready state until the war was ended. This was caused by offloading development onto people who went out for a “super rocket launcher” that had no place in the war. All too often, some excited designers did indeed get ahead of themselves when it came to what worked but was a bit too much (and ultimately impractical for the Army at the time). The inability to develop hollow-charge (HEAT) ammo for cannon and howitzers to reach its minimum potential (twice the caliber in penetration or better) was common for all countries including the U.S. The 105mm howitzer round was pretty good and while disparaged by all and sundry even the 75mm howitzer’s shell could (and did) take out medium armor. Barnes refers to the M3 and M5 light tank as "excellent" when the tanker's epithet would have been "tin plated coffin with a pea-shooter". Here we have an issue with comparing numbers such as armor thickness and penetration power of guns to facts; it is common to think they were butchered such as in Africa when in fact they fought well enough, flaws and all. But they were not the weapons the tankers wanted (nor deserved), and thus tanker’s complaints were valid. And, yes, they were not seen as a prime resource for fighting German tanks and hence reverted to recon and infantry support roles. Where they continued to meet and destroy German armor (but also be destroyed). Any German field commander would have loved to have a battalion of M5s on hand chasing down and chewing up U.S. troops; the contribution of the men in the light tanks in Europe in 1944 and 1945 is all too often belittled by the “number nerds” who toss the light tanks off as useless. They were anything but useless. Why were the M10, M18, and M36 designed as “Gun Motor Carriages” and not tanks? Because they were developed for the tank destroyer forces and the very bigoted officers who held the most sway on development wanted them to be nothing but “motorized antitank guns”. If they had been designed as tanks that would have invalidated Tank Destroyer Doctrine immediately. And yet, in the end, the men doing the fighting needed and wanted tanks, so they used them as tanks as much as they could, despite the open roof and lack of internal machine guns. It is claimed the gun motor carriages were cheaper than tanks (a specious argument given price varied by manufacturer and ultimately depended more on quantities produced not some arbitrary raw number) but to produce the gun motor carriages for a specialist role that was neither tank nor artillery (albeit they were used for both) was a costly thing to do. The failure to develop a better light tank in time is not mentioned even though the T7 light tank with a 57-mm gun was ready in mid-1942 and could have been in the field around 1943 (the Armored Forces botched that one). The M24 was a nice tank but too late simply because development came too late because development had been stunted badly by congress and it’s miserly pre-1941 budget. There are errors: The design of the M24 began in 1943, not 1945. The 76-mm gun could hardly penetrate the "...heaviest German tank armor." But it could penetrate a lot of armor and the myth that all German tanks were Tigers and Panthers is one of those fantasies of the war pursued by people who are glorifying the war not understanding it (most German armor was medium or lighter), let alone the myth that they were always met head-on is ridiculous. The 90-mm gun was not optimized for anti-tank use and hence had the same issues with dealing with the frontal armor of the Panther (though it could handle the Tiger) and yet was better at that than many other guns. The tendency to adapt anti-aircraft guns for anti-tank guns was common and is where Germany got its 88s and the 128mm. The U.S. found it did not need a lot of 90mms (the homeland was not threatened and what it produced was enough for its needs); there was never the demand for a higher altitude version and hence nothing like the 8.8cm FLAK 41 was developed which led to the 8.8cm Kwk43 and Pak43s; yet Ordnance built their own versions of hot 90mm for tank use. I missed the boat in my original review failing to detail how the Army’s main issue was the budget provided by Congress and politicians from 1920 through 1940. They starved the Army; the U.S. was peaceful and they had no interest in making it a military country and as such kept the Army small (and starved the air forces and Navy as well but not as badly). This crippled development; while the Soviets started building a modern Army in 1930 complete with investment in tank forces and tank arsenals; the Germans in 1934 or so; and British in 1934 or so; the U.S. politicians did not begin serious spending on the Army until 1941. Before then, the budget was all about “beans, bullets, and bayonets” and of course bodes to wield them. The Army had to struggle with what it had and put to field what was practical not what was best. Thus, for example, the recoilless rifles (used by the Germans in 1940) did not arrive in U.S. use until 1945. And yet a U.S. officer bult the first recoilless rifle to be used way back around 1916. Indeed, a brief little discussion on how the U.S. produced what it did based on budget would have opened many eyes. The Soviets produced so many thousand T34s for example, more than the U.S. – and in the U.S. the budget people were always saying, “You don’t need any more, stop building them!” As mentioned, the number of 90mm AA guns the U.S. produced was not based on manufacturing capacity but because they didn’t need more. Thus - there is a lot of information and many details many people will never have heard before. There are also many missing details concerning the Ordnance Department struggles to get things done in a very brief time frame thanks to how Congress had refused to let them do anything earlier. Dig into that deeper and you might find it nauseating the way people played games that hindered the U.S. Army in its job of helping beat the Germans. And sometimes couldn't put 2 and 2 together to get the right answer. But, they were human after all, and people do make mistakes. In my original review I argued that “If you want a politics free book you will not get it in this once, not unless you shut your eyes and remain ignorant . . .” but that is wrong. If this was a political book, Barnes might have ripped the budget mongers of the 1920s and 1930s a new sphincter for leaving the Army (and U.S. military as a whole) in such a bad situation as they did when war broke out. But, Barnes had more class than I do.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2015

recommand products