SKU: 70335692251

RAVENSCROFT, Edward The English Lawyer; a Comedy: Acted at the Royal Theatre.

Sale price$900.00 Regular price$1000.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $250.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 26 - Jul 31

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

RAVENSCROFT, Edward The English Lawyer; a Comedy: Acted at the Royal Theatre.Ravenscroft's Ruggle RAVENSCROFT, Edward The English Lawyer; a Comedy: Acted at the Royal Theatre. London: Printed by J. M. for James Vade at the Cock and Sugar loaf near St. Dunstans Church in Fleet street. 1678. Small 4to. Twentieth century brown morocco by Sangorski & Sutcliffe for Phillip C. Broughton (initials P. C. B. gilt to upper board), turn ins ruled in gilt, two raised bands, spine lettered directly in gilt, edges stained red; pp. [iv], 67,

Ravenscroft's Ruggle

RAVENSCROFT, Edward The English Lawyer; a Comedy: Acted at the Royal Theatre. London: Printed by J. M. for James Vade at the Cock and Sugar-loaf near St. Dunstan’s Church in Fleet-street. 1678.

Small 4to. Twentieth-century brown morocco by Sangorski & Sutcliffe for Phillip C. Broughton (initials P.C.B. gilt to upper board), turn-ins ruled in gilt, two raised bands, spine lettered directly in gilt, edges stained red; pp. [iv], 67, [3], bound without final blank K4; inner margin of title subtly reinforced, not affecting printed area, uniform toning, slightly foxed throughout; overall very good; twentieth-century Sotheran’s stamp, Sackville Street, to front pastedown.

Very scarce first edition of Ravenscroft’s adaptation of George Ruggle’s celebrated Latin comedy Ignoramus, first printed in 1630.
Edward Ravenscroft (fl. 1659–1697), playwright, was admitted to the Inner Temple in 1659 and to the Middle Temple in 1667, though there is no evidence that he was called to the bar, and he appears to have devoted his attention mainly to literature. By the early 1670s he had turned to the theatre, becoming one of the period’s more active refashioners of earlier plays for the Restoration stage.

The English Lawyer is Ravenscroft’s English adaptation of Ruggle’s Latin comedy, first printed in 1630. Ravenscroft brings the celebrated university comedy to the public theatre, retaining the biting satirisation of loquacious and avaricious lawyers, but reducing the original five-hour performance to less than three hours. In addition to Ruggle’s original, Ravenscroft’s sources likely include earlier English translations by Fernando Parkhurst in 1660 and Robert Codrington in 1662, both of which represent faithful translations rather than attempts to adapt the play to the commercial stage. The result is a notable revival of one of the most famous academic plays of the Jacobean period, here recast for performance at the Royal Theatre in 1677.

Ravenscroft’s deftly crafted farce of mistaken identity follows the convoluted and ultimately unsuccessful attempts of the English lawyer Ignoramus to marry the Moroccan ward of a Portuguese merchant living in Smyrna, while offering a sharp critique of the jargon of common law. Ignoramus’ fondness for delivering pompous legal maxims in Latin self-consciously evokes the habits and speech of ‘the archetypal English lawyer of the early modern period’, Sir Edward Coke. Although the former Chief Justice had died in 1634, his writings remained the subject of debate throughout the seventeenth century. In the epilogue to The English Lawyer, Ignoramus exactly reproduces phrases drawn from Coke’s Institutes of the Laws of England: ‘Criticks are all free Subjects, and to be debar’d of their Liberty is directly against Magna Charta, the very fundamental Laws of the Realm’ (Raffield, p. 385).

Ravenscroft’s own legal associations give the choice of subject particular interest. His connection with the Inns of Court appears to have been somewhat unsettled: four years prior to the staging of The English Lawyer, on 30 May 1673, Ravenscroft’s chamber was seized for arrears in rent. More broadly, Ravenscroft is remembered as the first critic to posit that Titus Andronicus was not originally the work of Shakespeare, a position now known as the ‘Ravenscroft tradition’.

This copy is the only example of any edition to have appeared at auction since 1993.

ESTC R7262; Wing R2211. See Raffield, ‘A Discredited Priesthood’ (2005).

SKU: 2125024

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 70335692251

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
joseph
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Size: 10.5, Color: 8/Brown
I’ve been wearing these Bruno Marc Men’s Casual Dress Shoes for a while now, and they have exceeded my expectations! The quality and craftsmanship are impressive for the price, and they look just as stylish as high-end brands. One of the best things about these shoes is their comfort—even after long hours on my feet, they still feel great. The cushioned insole provides solid support, and the fit is just right. Whether I’m at work, attending an event, or just out and about, these shoes hold up beautifully. Durability is another plus. The materials feel sturdy, and the stitching is well done. I also love the versatility—they pair well with dress pants, chinos, or even jeans. Overall, these shoes are a fantastic value. If you’re looking for a stylish, comfortable, and affordable pair of dress shoes, I highly recommend them!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Paulie G
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Amazing Shoes
Size: 9, Color: Brown
This is my first time wearing a Bruno Marc MaxFlex Dress Sneakers Oxfords Casual Wingtip Brogue Shoes. I was quite impressed how the shoes arrived and how they had a protection bag over each shoe. Very impressed by that, The shoes are very comfortable , lightweight squishy and affordable and very stylish. I recommend them.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Austin
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable and complimentary
Size: 11, Color: Brown
The shoes are very comfortable and easily broke in after two wears. I get several compliments on them daily, and others have purchased them after seeing mine. I also have the black pair, but the brown ones are my favorite. Sizing is true to size, an excellent value for your money, and they are lightweight and breathable. The soles are thick, which makes them extremely comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mark Lorenzana
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Comfy and non slip! Amazing!
Size: 9.5, Color: All Black
I work 12hrs sometimes on my feet. These shoes are amazing !!! Broke them in on a 10hr shift and they feel like walking on pillows. My feet were comfy and not throbbing. I felt the difference in the non slip in the kitchen and I’ll say it outright……. Worth the $40! I got the brown coming and I’m assuming they’ll be just as comfortable. Bruno Marc’s are great!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
Vincent Feller
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 4
Nice but not ideal sizing.
These look nice. They do not have a traditional tongue, replacing it with some sort of elastic lining. They do fit larger than expected. I purchased wide since normally need that and it creates a bump just below the laces. Also, after size 11 there are only whole size increases. I feel an 11.5 regular would have fit better. They are pretty comfortable with a cushiony insole and thick sole.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026

recommand products